The Unknowable Engine: Blind Spots as Foundational Features of Situated Cognition

Preview:
This article challenges the classical idea that intelligence is built on perfect knowledge. The Dynamic Quadranym Model (DQM) argues that structural blind spots — in how we perceive the world and in how we understand our own actions — are not flaws but features. They guarantee that intelligence never reaches completion, but must always move, adapt, & reorient.

Blind spots are not flaws of mind but its engine—structural opacities that keep intelligence in motion.

In the prevailing models of cognition, the mind is often viewed as a rational engine striving for perfect information and complete control. It is assumed that with enough data and processing power, any cognitive system could, in theory, achieve a flawless understanding of the world and its own operations. However, the Dynamic Quadranym Model (DQM) challenges this assumption, positing that a situated, intelligent system operates not on a foundation of perfect knowledge, but on structural limitations it can never overcome. These are the two blind spots of orientation: the epistemological blind spot and the procedural blind spot. Far from being errors, these blind spots are foundational features that generate the very need for motion and adaptation. A perturbation is the system’s situational “not knowing what to do,” a temporary disruption that forces reorientation. A blind spot, by contrast, is the system’s structural “not knowing how its doing came to be,” a permanent opacity that cannot be overcome. Ignorance passes; blind spots remain.

The epistemological blind spot arises from the nature of perception itself. A cognitive system does not have direct access to reality; it only has a “capture device”—its own architecture of perception and sensation—that samples the world. Consequently, the information received is always a blend of the external world and the system’s own internal biases. A being cannot ever fully know if what it perceives is the world itself or merely its own unique, filtered reality, its Umwelt. In the DQM, this inherent uncertainty creates a constant source of Positive Displacement (PD), a pressure that forces the system to continuously re-orient. The system’s coherence is not measured by its accuracy in mapping the world, but by its ability to resolve the pressure created by the persistent, unresolvable tension between its internal model and the external environment.

This external limitation is mirrored by an internal one: the procedural blind spot. This blind spot separates a system from the origin of its own actions. In a high-pressure situation, an orientation system defaults to deeply embedded, often instinctive, procedures. The procedural blind spot means the system cannot definitively know whether its response—a sudden decision to run, a flash of anger, a surge of courage—is a hardwired, native reaction or a complex, learned invention. The system simply acts, and the origin of that action remains opaque. This is not a temporary ignorance that can be overcome with training; it is a permanent structural feature of the mind. It ensures that an intelligent being will always be, in some way, a stranger to its own genesis.

Together, these two blind spots guarantee a system will never have perfect control, but they also ensure it will always have motion. The epistemological blind spot provides the constant pressure to move by highlighting the perpetual tension between the self and the world. The procedural blind spot ensures that the system will move, by forcing it to rely on fast, implicit, and often instinctive responses when faced with overwhelming displacement. The DQM reframes intelligence not as the achievement of knowledge, but as the art of navigating these permanent limitations, turning the fundamental opacity of being into a dynamic engine of change.

Take Away:

  1. Blind Spots: Not Perturbations
    • Perturbations = situational disruptions (“not knowing what to do”).
    • Blind Spots = structural opacities (“not knowing how doing came to be”).
  2. Blind Spots: Two Kinds
    • Epistemological: hides the world’s true nature (capture device bias).
    • Procedural: hides the origin of your own actions (instinct vs. invention, nature vs. nurture).
  3. Blind Spots: Permanent, Not Temporary
    • Ignorance passes with knowledge.
    • Perturbations pass with reorientation or resolution.
    • Blind spots remain.
  4. Blind Spots: Engines, Not Errors
    • They ensure you will never have perfect control.
    • They guarantee you will always have motion.

Pocket Line:

Ignorance passes; perturbations launch; blind spots remain — the unknowability that keeps orientation alive.