How do we orient to dropping an apple?

In the Q model, orienting to the act of dropping an apple involves positioning both yourself and the apple within situational and dynamical contexts, taking into account both potential and actual states.

Situational Context (External factors):

You are physically holding the apple. The environment, including gravity, the ground, and any nearby objects, influences the apple’s trajectory once it is dropped. Gravity ensures the apple will fall, and your action of releasing it initiates the event.

Dynamical Context (Internal factors):

Internally, you anticipate the apple’s possible outcomes—will it bounce, roll, or bruise? These expectations are shaped by your past experiences with falling objects. Your mind prepares for what might happen as you align your internal responses to the anticipated external event.

Quadranyms Involved:

• Spatial Quadranym:
  The apple starts in your hand, occupying a specific spatial position. When you release it, its relationship to the ground shifts. The void (empty space between your hand and the ground) becomes relevant as the apple moves through it.
• Energy Quadranym:
  The act of dropping the apple is the release of stored potential energy (from your hand). As it falls, the energy converts to kinetic energy, and when it hits the ground, this energy transfers or dissipates (e.g., the apple bounces or bruises).
• Time Quadranym:
  The event unfolds over time. The present moment anchors the action (you drop the apple), the future contains the apple’s fall and eventual landing, and the past influences your expectations for what might happen.
• Agent Quadranym:
  You, the agent, actively decide to release the apple. Your goal might be to observe or test the result or simply to perform the action for its own sake.

Active-Actual vs. Passive-Potential States:

• Active-Actual State:
  The apple in your hand represents the active-actual state. Once released, the active-actual state shifts to reflect the apple in motion as it falls.
• Passive-Potential State:
  Before being released, the apple holds the passive potential to fall. This potential is realized once you let go.

Orientation:

Your mental and physical orientation involves predicting the trajectory and consequences of the apple dropping. You anticipate the outcome based on the reality of gravity while adjusting to the current state (holding the apple) and the potential future state (the apple on the ground).

Mapping this simple action to the Q model reveals how various contexts—situational and dynamical—interact. Quadranyms guide your interpretation of the event and help process both immediate actions and future outcomes. This orientation prepares you for real-world interactions and predictions of what might happen.

System B’s Role:

System B provides a virtual experience by triggering expectations and preparing for potential disappointments. These orientations are processed by System C, which responds to all the orientations at once. This creates a normative response—a response that adapts to the situation by learning from past interpersonal experiences.

Dynamic Interaction of Systems B and C:

System B, responsible for virtual orientation, simulates the agent’s expectations and generates multiple orientations based on these expectations. System C processes these orientations by comparing them with real experiences. Through feedback, System C refines its normative response over time, continuously learning from interpersonal and environmental interactions.

This interaction mirrors how humans learn and adapt to complex situations. System B offers possibilities, and System C evaluates these in real-time, generating the most appropriate response based on both internal and external factors.

Where Do Constraints Come From?

In the Q model, constraints arise from interactions between reference frames (RFs), DQMs, and feedback loops across Systems A, B, and C. Let’s explore where these constraints originate:

• System A (External Inputs):
  Constraints from System A come from the situational context—the observable, external factors like gravity, objects, and the ground. These inputs set boundaries on what the system can perceive and interact with, limiting possible responses.
• System B (Internal Inputs):
  System B provides internal constraints via virtual orientations based on psychological patterns, such as past experiences. DQMs act as reference frames that organize potential responses, filtering out less relevant options based on these internal models.
• System C (Normative Feedback):
  System C evaluates responses by imposing normative constraints. These constraints arise from social norms, interpersonal dynamics, and the system’s goal to maintain coherent responses. Feedback from System C shapes how System B continues to orient in future situations.
• Summation of DQMs (Reference Frames):
  DQMs function as reference frames, which guide how the system narrows down possible responses. Each DQM constrains the orientation of the system, ensuring that it remains within the appropriate range of possibilities for the given context.

Backdoor Feedback and Normative Responses:

Systems B and C collaborate through backdoor feedback loops to produce a normative response. System C selects the appropriate orientation based on the constraints provided by System B, adjusting for social pressures or situational demands. The general DQM ensures the AI orients toward a normative response that fits the situation.

By integrating these feedback loops, the AI can generate responses that are both contextually appropriate and socially aligned. System B offers orientation options, while System C selects the best fit, ensuring that responses adapt dynamically to the environment.

An Example of Dropping the Apple:

System A processes possible scenarios: perhaps the apple gets smashed, rolls down stairs, or is no longer fit to eat. System B orients these scenarios by drawing on spatial, gravitational, and social orientations. System C then selects the best response based on real-time situational constraints.

This process ensures that System B offers the possible orientations, and System C refines and selects the best normative response. The result is a refined system of decision-making, responsive to the immediate environment.

Conclusion:

System C’s role is to select the most appropriate normative response based on the orientations and constraints provided by System B, incorporating situational context and social dynamics. Each DQM offers a potential solution, and System C evaluates which response best fits the context at hand. Whether the decision requires urgency or caution, System C fine-tunes the response to align with both immediate needs and broader social expectations.

By Dane Scalise

Summary assisted by ChatGPT

---